Skip to main content

The rise of blockchain technology has brought about a new form of digital asset – security tokens. These tokens represent ownership of a real-world asset, such as equity in a company, real estate, or commodities. They offer a more efficient and secure way to transfer ownership and provide investors with more liquidity and transparency.

However, as with any new technology, there are challenges to overcome. One of the biggest challenges facing the security token industry is standardization. In this article, we will explore the limitations of security token standardization and why it may not be possible to have a universal standard for security tokens.

The Need for Security Token Standardization

What is a Security Token Standard?

A security token standard is a set of rules and guidelines that govern the creation, issuance, and transfer of security tokens. These standards ensure that security tokens are compliant with regulations and can be easily traded on different platforms.

The most well-known security token standard is the ERC-20 standard, which was created for the issuance of utility tokens on the Ethereum blockchain. However, due to the unique nature of security tokens, a new set of standards is needed to govern their creation and transfer.

The Benefits of Standardization

 

Standardization is beneficial for the widespread adoption of security tokens. It provides a level of trust and confidence for investors, as they know that the tokens they are investing in are compliant with regulations and can be easily traded on different platforms.

Standardization also makes it easier for companies to issue security tokens, as they can follow a set of guidelines rather than trying to navigate the complex regulatory landscape on their own. 

The Limitations of Security Token Standardization

Regulatory Differences

One of the main limitations of security token standardization is the vast differences in regulations between different countries and regions. Each country or region has its own set of laws and regulations governing securities, and these regulations can vary greatly.

For example, the United States has strict regulations for securities, while countries like Switzerland and Singapore have more loosier regulations. This means that a security token that is compliant in one country may not be compliant in another, making it difficult to have a universal standard for security tokens.

Nature of Underlying Assets

Another limitation of security token standardization is the nature of the underlying assets. Security tokens can represent ownership of a wide range of assets, from traditional stocks and bonds to more unique assets like real estate and fine art.

Each of these assets has its own set of regulations and requirements, making it challenging to create a standard that can cover all types of assets. For example, the regulations for tokenizing real estate may be vastly different from the regulations for tokenizing stocks.

Complexity of Tokenization

Tokenizing an asset is a complex process that involves legal, technical, and financial considerations. Each asset may require a different approach to tokenization, making it difficult to create a one-size-fits-all standard.

Real-World Examples of Security Token Standardization Limitations

The Case of tZERO

tZERO is a security token trading platform that was launched in 2019. It was created by Overstock.com, a company that has been at the forefront of blockchain technology adoption.

tZERO’s goal was to create a platform that would allow for the trading of security tokens in a compliant and regulated manner. However, the platform has faced challenges due to the lack of standardization in the security token industry.

In an interview with Forbes, tZERO CEO Saum Noursalehi stated, “The biggest challenge we face is the lack of standardization in the industry. There are no standards for security tokens, and each token is unique, which makes it difficult to create a platform that can support all tokens.”

The Future of Security Token Standardization

While the limitations of security token standardization may seem daunting, there are efforts being made to address these challenges. However, it is important to recognize that due to the unique nature of security tokens, it may not be possible to have a universal standard that can cover all types of assets and regulations. Instead, we may see a more fragmented approach, with different standards for different types of assets and regions.

My Agile Privacy
This website uses technical and profiling cookies. Clicking on "Accept" authorises all profiling cookies. Clicking on "Refuse" or the X will refuse all profiling cookies. By clicking on "Customise" you can select which profiling cookies to activate.